I read an essay by Lisa Belkin in the NYT last week that got me thinking. The impetus for the essay, titled Too Many Ways to Have a Baby?, was the announcement by Sarah Jessica Parker and Mathew Broderick that they were expecting twins via surrogacy this summer. The essay itself was the fairly standard “Gosh darn, they can do just about anything with technology and where is it going to end” type article. It seemed a bit dated to me since surrogacy is hardly state of the art or shocking in 2009. And although it’s always a bit frustrating when something like surrogacy or donor eggs is lumped together with the Texas mother wanting to harvest her dead son’s sperm to create her own grandchildren or with Octomom, I suppose inclusion of these examples is fair since the purpose of the essay was to show where unrestricted technology can lead. But the part of the essay that I found interesting, in a disturbing sort of way, were the comments from readers.

There were a fair number of compassionate comments such as:

  • As someone who was fortunate enough to have the kids she wanted, I feel I am not in a position to judge the ones who have to resort to the new scientific methods. … I think as long as things are done in a legal manner, we should try to hold judgment! Yay for science!! ~ Anothermom
  • The desire to have children just like the desire to stay alive is a very strong biological and emotional drive. Just as we as a society continually strive for better healthcare and medical technology for one, so we will strive for the other. It is not so surprising. ~anne marie

But there were also quite a few comments like the following:

  • To me the answer is quite simple. If you can’t have children the natural way, adopt. There are SOOOO many children already out there, just wanting to be loved. ~yip
  • Why fight biology so hard? There are so many adults who want to be parents, there are so many children who want to be loved. It amazes me that more people don’t jump into adoption immediately like we did. ~Sarah
  • Adopt. If you can’t love a child who isn’t perfect, or who isn’t a DNA carbon copy of you, maybe you shouldn’t be a parent. ~ACW
  • While I cannot begin to understand how wrenching it must be for women who want to have babies but can’t, I’m also puzzled by why they go to such lengths to conceive when they could adopt. There are thousands upon thousands of babies in this country — and many others — waiting for a loving home. So why all the obsession with being pregnant and having your own baby? ~question
  • What natalist myopia. I want to throw up. Maybe Marilyn Quayle was right. Maybe women really don’t want to liberated from their essential natures. ~ AAARGH

Oh my, where to begin? Indeed, why not just adopt? Well, first of all, while it may be true that there are “thousands upon thousands of children in this country — and many others — waiting for a loving home,” not all of them are available for adoption, and few of them are babies. If only adoption were so simple as merely deciding and picking. Most people who want to adopt will be able to, but it is far from easy or quick.

But more important than the general misunderstanding of the realities of adoption, these comments reflect a basic misunderstanding of infertility— and adoption. Adoption is not a cure for infertility. An adopted child is not a generic replacement for the longed for biological child.

Adoption is a “cure” for childlessness, and for some that’s an easy and logical next step. But for others it is not. They yearn to see their genes in the next generation; they crave being pregnant and breastfeeding; they want some degree of control over their child’s intrauterine environment and genetic makeup. For them, parenthood is more than simply parenting. They want to procreate. Is it really that hard to understand that they simply want what comes so easy for most of us?

As someone who chose adoption even though we were not infertile, I can more than attest to the fact that adoption is a great—no, really a phenomenal—way to create a family, but it is not for everyone. I don’t want it to be. That’s not fair to the infertile, and it is certainly not fair to the prospective adopted child.

For more information on the emotional realities of infertility, check out the following Creating a Family radio shows:
April 2: Coping with Infertility
May 6: The Big Decisions in Infertility: How far to go, how many to transfer, and when to stop
Oct 7: Living a Child Free Life

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • FriendFeed
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Why Not Just Adopt I’m not sure what surprises me more—insensitivity towards the infertile...
  2. Having Your Cake and Eating it Too? Continuing in Infertility Treatment While Applying to Adopt Sitting as I do with one foot in the infertility...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.